Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-04 21:13:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9EADA94CE00754DE2C8322C7DF16E984F3F7AF985DF025C869D6975E44317EE0
Participant Details

Original Note:

“And to ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right. Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/read-justice-alito-initial-abortion-opinion-overturn-roe-v-wade-pdf-00029504

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521906236492558343
  • participantId - 9EADA94CE00754DE2C8322C7DF16E984F3F7AF985DF025C869D6975E44317EE0
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1651698818736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15219062364925583439EADA94CE00754DE2C8322C7DF16E984F3F7AF985DF025C869D6975E44317EE0