Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-03 06:30:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1E2AE6A240549C8D9D262DD7F36E4BFAC6D850BE043601473F9891174AA85FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The two seats on the court that made this draft ruling possible were stolen by the party which was out of power in the first case and which reversed its own reasoning in the second case. Additionally, the appointments were made by a baldly criminal President who attempted a coup.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521323254618771461
  • participantId - E1E2AE6A240549C8D9D262DD7F36E4BFAC6D850BE043601473F9891174AA85FF
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1651559400103
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1521323254618771461E1E2AE6A240549C8D9D262DD7F36E4BFAC6D850BE043601473F9891174AA85FF