Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-03 06:18:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5286894FACC541689EF66D9182AE4F8A742EFEC146E573878B26497F7B06E4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The two seats on the court that made this draft ruling possible were stolen by the party which was out of power in the first case and which reversed its own reasoning in the second case. Additionally, the appointments were made by a baldly criminal President who attempted a coup.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521323254618771461
  • participantId - D5286894FACC541689EF66D9182AE4F8A742EFEC146E573878B26497F7B06E4F
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1651558688051
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1521323254618771461D5286894FACC541689EF66D9182AE4F8A742EFEC146E573878B26497F7B06E4F