Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-03 23:00:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B41247447CF0EC824B15AEE3CC37FE478E1F6822AFA1C4AF60487E7916916176
Participant Details

Original Note:

The two seats on the court that made this draft ruling possible were stolen by the party which was out of power in the first case and which reversed its own reasoning in the second case. Additionally, the appointments were made by a baldly criminal President who attempted a coup.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521323254618771461
  • participantId - B41247447CF0EC824B15AEE3CC37FE478E1F6822AFA1C4AF60487E7916916176
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1651618848245
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1521323254618771461B41247447CF0EC824B15AEE3CC37FE478E1F6822AFA1C4AF60487E7916916176