Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-03 05:48:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3517B20DB0798FE53CC8DAC0CF4C3A0A35A76B4C38F47B9359CFC38F90970FF0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The two seats on the court that made this draft ruling possible were stolen by the party which was out of power in the first case and which reversed its own reasoning in the second case. Additionally, the appointments were made by a baldly criminal President who attempted a coup.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521323254618771461
  • participantId - 3517B20DB0798FE53CC8DAC0CF4C3A0A35A76B4C38F47B9359CFC38F90970FF0
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1651556886934
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 15213232546187714613517B20DB0798FE53CC8DAC0CF4C3A0A35A76B4C38F47B9359CFC38F90970FF0