Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-04-26 17:42:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CC2F215BB8E7CBE8052546DFE31E546C5F50CE17FDD7E95B2C6A9DD56044D2B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is a lot of controversy about this topic. The "personal information" was put into the whois database intentionally, making it public. It was made public by its owner. Pointing out that it is already online hasn't revealed anything "private".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1516495510651109377
  • participantId - CC2F215BB8E7CBE8052546DFE31E546C5F50CE17FDD7E95B2C6A9DD56044D2B6
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1650994932083
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1516495510651109377CC2F215BB8E7CBE8052546DFE31E546C5F50CE17FDD7E95B2C6A9DD56044D2B6