Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-04-20 23:10:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DD60107098AEC24D187D286E17E2A53C896C4617C50FA6A0480621B9ED0A325
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is a lot of controversy about this topic. The "personal information" was put into the whois database intentionally, making it public. It was made public by its owner. Pointing out that it is already online hasn't revealed anything "private".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1516495510651109377
  • participantId - 4DD60107098AEC24D187D286E17E2A53C896C4617C50FA6A0480621B9ED0A325
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1650496243655
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 15164955106511093774DD60107098AEC24D187D286E17E2A53C896C4617C50FA6A0480621B9ED0A325