Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-04-23 01:26:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B683F53A71314B5B037053E967D8B7476EE62CEC7C245474E462A3294BE2995
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is a lot of controversy about this topic. The "personal information" was put into the whois database intentionally, making it public. It was made public by its owner. Pointing out that it is already online hasn't revealed anything "private".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1516495510651109377
  • participantId - 0B683F53A71314B5B037053E967D8B7476EE62CEC7C245474E462A3294BE2995
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1650677187973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 15164955106511093770B683F53A71314B5B037053E967D8B7476EE62CEC7C245474E462A3294BE2995