Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-02-24 20:59:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5763BF42FC42EAC8B8B6DD9F60F9F3F2BA0E67F9E3B7625849BAAF4382B52C7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court's order is clear that they're considering this case on free speech grounds. It doesn't have anything to do with freedom of religion. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022222zor_bq7d.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1496354974695145480
  • participantId - 5763BF42FC42EAC8B8B6DD9F60F9F3F2BA0E67F9E3B7625849BAAF4382B52C7D
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1645736361813
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 14963549746951454805763BF42FC42EAC8B8B6DD9F60F9F3F2BA0E67F9E3B7625849BAAF4382B52C7D