Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-02-14 17:35:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 768C4C4EA7E7720283DD0F9889D728C4E17B575949BC8CFFC54ECE5EF81A8897
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Durham court filing includes several significant allegations, including illegal monitoring of DNS lookups, unauthorized server access, and representing data to the DOJ. It does not, however, allege that any firm was paid to plant evidence. https://t.co/IXEEJTe4ss

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1492990348121063433
  • participantId - 768C4C4EA7E7720283DD0F9889D728C4E17B575949BC8CFFC54ECE5EF81A8897
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1644860127801
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1492990348121063433768C4C4EA7E7720283DD0F9889D728C4E17B575949BC8CFFC54ECE5EF81A8897