Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-02-12 03:14:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DF58322310DA1A828748BCA73E887D06E901A8A1C5CD826A40802969278859E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Though ridiculous, it is worded in a serious matter with serious implications about a semipublic figure. No counter source because it didn't happen

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1492172507067174918
  • participantId - DF58322310DA1A828748BCA73E887D06E901A8A1C5CD826A40802969278859E3
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1644635667859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1492172507067174918DF58322310DA1A828748BCA73E887D06E901A8A1C5CD826A40802969278859E3