Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-01-04 22:59:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 50B5F84B90F252563590EAB715BBF92B72E2969297E519D4C00E6B59C5D53F65
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence for this claim, and the claim is impossibly broad. The author then tries to shut down conversation by saying that only people who have tried this (potentially dangerous) approach can argue.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1478403606806249476
  • participantId - 50B5F84B90F252563590EAB715BBF92B72E2969297E519D4C00E6B59C5D53F65
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1641337194380
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 147840360680624947650B5F84B90F252563590EAB715BBF92B72E2969297E519D4C00E6B59C5D53F65