Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-12 03:10:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C731A489D8D432280180C6B1B490540929642F15D773E5FB122275C640FED7EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYT headline is clearly biased in favor of Rittenhouse. I had to check to make sure it wasn't an opinion piece. But bias doesn't make the writer a monster and it has not been determined yet in court whether Rittenhouse is in fact a murderer.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1458850155059298308
  • participantId - C731A489D8D432280180C6B1B490540929642F15D773E5FB122275C640FED7EF
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1636686647652
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1458850155059298308C731A489D8D432280180C6B1B490540929642F15D773E5FB122275C640FED7EF