Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-16 02:14:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A227869B752DF62F7538C29F2D2D225BAE499F3095FF33A985D81DD1C622A0E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYT headline is clearly biased in favor of Rittenhouse. I had to check to make sure it wasn't an opinion piece. But bias doesn't make the writer a monster and it has not been determined yet in court whether Rittenhouse is in fact a murderer.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1458850155059298308
  • participantId - A227869B752DF62F7538C29F2D2D225BAE499F3095FF33A985D81DD1C622A0E8
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1637028850736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1458850155059298308A227869B752DF62F7538C29F2D2D225BAE499F3095FF33A985D81DD1C622A0E8