Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-12 03:50:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65DDA1616461AA72EBEEA172CA3C5B4C6FC43B5010298D50390E861335C4AEF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYT headline is clearly biased in favor of Rittenhouse. I had to check to make sure it wasn't an opinion piece. But bias doesn't make the writer a monster and it has not been determined yet in court whether Rittenhouse is in fact a murderer.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1458850155059298308
  • participantId - 65DDA1616461AA72EBEEA172CA3C5B4C6FC43B5010298D50390E861335C4AEF1
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1636689058200
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 145885015505929830865DDA1616461AA72EBEEA172CA3C5B4C6FC43B5010298D50390E861335C4AEF1