Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-11-10 04:39:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E874D0C10B03C31CDBF909EB345ADF2FAB4EB3F1B7E668F3EDCDEF9D6B567E12
Participant Details

Original Note:

According to both Wikipedia and Google, rigorous skepticism is critical to the Scientific Method. If you can question it, its Science. If you can't question it, its propaganda. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1458198158937399306
  • participantId - E874D0C10B03C31CDBF909EB345ADF2FAB4EB3F1B7E668F3EDCDEF9D6B567E12
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1636519164891
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1458198158937399306E874D0C10B03C31CDBF909EB345ADF2FAB4EB3F1B7E668F3EDCDEF9D6B567E12