Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-10-29 18:14:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69F1DDDEC327CF89418D6E78A8F4AF79A3335F37179E565A0D8E28E310C17AE3
Participant Details

Original Note:

A closer look suggests that the implied visual argument may have a few gaps. I hope that a member of the House Intelligence committee looks at real intelligence w a better analytical eye than he does Twitter pictures. https://twitter.com/comfortablysmug/status/1454137262736875522?s=21

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1454145945688584201
  • participantId - 69F1DDDEC327CF89418D6E78A8F4AF79A3335F37179E565A0D8E28E310C17AE3
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1635531247710
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 145414594568858420169F1DDDEC327CF89418D6E78A8F4AF79A3335F37179E565A0D8E28E310C17AE3