Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-10-12 23:38:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7E481B417591CB6D704F2D8170AC72E45F9816EBCCCD2989B37BFC12EB1EC7B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Blow here presents rumor as fact, and goes on to make large implications for which there is no evidence and has few credible supporters in science. Context: https://www.science.org/content/article/why-many-scientists-say-unlikely-sars-cov-2-originated-lab-leak https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02596-2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1447776635273502723
  • participantId - 7E481B417591CB6D704F2D8170AC72E45F9816EBCCCD2989B37BFC12EB1EC7B1
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1634081919945
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 14477766352735027237E481B417591CB6D704F2D8170AC72E45F9816EBCCCD2989B37BFC12EB1EC7B1