Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-09-25 22:19:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43C0C6E62BBB03EF795C48F090C5C67A52516FE15C8B571592C9BE8300DFD93E
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. The grant that was rejected by DARPA that Zeynep refers to refered to different cleavage sites and not only the furin site 2. The furin site, that SARS-2 has, cannot have been engineered. see Holmes et al 2021. Thus the dismissal of engineering conspiracies still stands.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1441848234226290695
  • participantId - 43C0C6E62BBB03EF795C48F090C5C67A52516FE15C8B571592C9BE8300DFD93E
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1632608353071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 144184823422629069543C0C6E62BBB03EF795C48F090C5C67A52516FE15C8B571592C9BE8300DFD93E