Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-09-05 05:46:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6CA275727E456EF98CBEDEC11FBDEDCF3B63EF9B9C7261F7CCFC0C58C5D2DF63
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not only are there factual errors in the article/post, but also the magazine is using a photo from 26 Jan 2021 for their new article: https://twitter.com/logicbot3000/status/1434292673695948806?s=21

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1434332710487609344
  • participantId - 6CA275727E456EF98CBEDEC11FBDEDCF3B63EF9B9C7261F7CCFC0C58C5D2DF63
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1630820794817
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 14343327104876093446CA275727E456EF98CBEDEC11FBDEDCF3B63EF9B9C7261F7CCFC0C58C5D2DF63