Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-09-05 19:24:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CAEB716E266F4A2CCC03A920DB35B6A55781EBCA8C8C67D4BC87AE3EA4C894A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not only are there factual errors in the article/post, but also the magazine is using a photo from 26 Jan 2021 for their new article: https://twitter.com/logicbot3000/status/1434292673695948806?s=21

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1434332710487609344
  • participantId - 0CAEB716E266F4A2CCC03A920DB35B6A55781EBCA8C8C67D4BC87AE3EA4C894A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1630869889439
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 14343327104876093440CAEB716E266F4A2CCC03A920DB35B6A55781EBCA8C8C67D4BC87AE3EA4C894A