Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-06-26 03:34:55 UTC -

Rated by Participant: 591BD82F4D59FC81B8C2A64482751C98A6F221D751609D7C775DA6AE904A2DD3
Participant Details

Original Note:

A judge has ruled that Hill's case had nothing to do with revenge porn and was instead legitimate journalism that was aimed at exposing her corruption, which included both sleeping with staffers and embezzlement. This misrepresents the case to present the abuser as a victim. https://theavtimes.com/2021/04/21/judge-deals-former-av-congresswoman-another-legal-defeat-in-revenge-porn-lawsuit/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1408568560297857031
  • participantId - 591BD82F4D59FC81B8C2A64482751C98A6F221D751609D7C775DA6AE904A2DD3
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1624678495541
  • version - 1
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 1
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 1
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 1
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 1
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1408568560297857031591BD82F4D59FC81B8C2A64482751C98A6F221D751609D7C775DA6AE904A2DD3