Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-06-26 03:15:36 UTC -

Rated by Participant: 2B5FDDE94B407E8D7B8F357BEB6A7163C57AAEE14D3892EBE7820172CBCFD5BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

A judge has ruled that Hill's case had nothing to do with revenge porn and was instead legitimate journalism that was aimed at exposing her corruption, which included both sleeping with staffers and embezzlement. This misrepresents the case to present the abuser as a victim. https://theavtimes.com/2021/04/21/judge-deals-former-av-congresswoman-another-legal-defeat-in-revenge-porn-lawsuit/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1408568560297857031
  • participantId - 2B5FDDE94B407E8D7B8F357BEB6A7163C57AAEE14D3892EBE7820172CBCFD5BB
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1624677336612
  • version - 1
  • agree - 1
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 1
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 1
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 14085685602978570312B5FDDE94B407E8D7B8F357BEB6A7163C57AAEE14D3892EBE7820172CBCFD5BB