Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-02-24 13:30:33 UTC -

Rated by Participant: DDC5697438546E6512C407343F7E570D4098BF004629A4BDF96961ABD458F2ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

Despite having the conclusion deemed without merit or evidence in over a score of courts, Crowder insists that he has proof for fraud. He presents none in the clip, instead diverting focus to “double standards,” in media.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1364461172968275969
  • participantId - DDC5697438546E6512C407343F7E570D4098BF004629A4BDF96961ABD458F2ED
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1614173433165
  • version - 1
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 1
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 1
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 1
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1364461172968275969DDC5697438546E6512C407343F7E570D4098BF004629A4BDF96961ABD458F2ED