Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-02-24 23:26:33 UTC -

Rated by Participant: 661A192F2A53D689DC4A5F3297CDF0923B86981D9B58D6DC32DCEB3B2A139734
Participant Details

Original Note:

Despite having the conclusion deemed without merit or evidence in over a score of courts, Crowder insists that he has proof for fraud. He presents none in the clip, instead diverting focus to “double standards,” in media.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1364461172968275969
  • participantId - 661A192F2A53D689DC4A5F3297CDF0923B86981D9B58D6DC32DCEB3B2A139734
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1614209193389
  • version - 1
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 1
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 1
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 1
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1364461172968275969661A192F2A53D689DC4A5F3297CDF0923B86981D9B58D6DC32DCEB3B2A139734