Birdwatch Note
2025-08-07 03:53:11 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Der 15-jährige wurde nicht umgebracht. Er hat Suizid begangen. Mithäftlinge hatten mindestens zwei Beamten Körperverletzung im Amt vorgeworfen. Es wird derzeit ermittelt. Die Behauptung er sei umgebracht worden ist eine Falschbehauptung. Quelle: https://www.sr.de/sr/home/nachrichten/selbstmord_jva_ottweiler_verdachtspruefungsverfahren_100.html
Written by DDB40DCAE0B1A9FB90EAF8729873014761D5EC582A3EB98A17B5563B757641E2
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1953075183918494123
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1953303382241792094
- noteId - 1953303382241792094
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DDB40DCAE0B1A9FB90EAF8729873014761D5EC582A3EB98A17B5563B757641E2 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1754538791606
- tweetId - 1953075183918494123
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Der 15-jährige wurde nicht umgebracht. Er hat Suizid begangen. Mithäftlinge hatten mindestens zwei Beamten Körperverletzung im Amt vorgeworfen. Es wird derzeit ermittelt. Die Behauptung er sei umgebracht worden ist eine Falschbehauptung. Quelle: https://www.sr.de/sr/home/nachrichten/selbstmord_jva_ottweiler_verdachtspruefungsverfahren_100.html
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-08-07 02:29:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 01:43:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 00:09:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 05:25:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 03:41:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 03:16:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 02:46:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 01:44:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 01:41:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 05:12:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 02:24:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 01:17:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 00:50:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 05:04:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 00:33:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 01:00:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-06 23:53:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 05:08:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 03:48:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 03:14:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 03:03:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 00:15:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-06 23:37:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 03:03:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 01:29:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 04:50:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 01:57:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 04:46:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 01:21:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-08-07 01:21:03 -0500 | Rating Details |