Birdwatch Note
2025-07-17 16:00:23 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - grok already gave context in the original post's reply
Written by 7E7EF80C8885EC81618BFFA07DEFE7F90D8254C45516B13E958D1148EB046559
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1945834428753911819
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1945876242881986696
- noteId - 1945876242881986696
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7E7EF80C8885EC81618BFFA07DEFE7F90D8254C45516B13E958D1148EB046559 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1752768023592
- tweetId - 1945834428753911819
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - grok already gave context in the original post's reply
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-07-17 11:10:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-17 11:04:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-17 11:02:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-17 12:18:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-17 11:51:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-17 11:05:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-17 11:02:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-07-17 11:03:44 -0500 | Rating Details |