Birdwatch Note
2025-06-09 10:08:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Sadly, Snopes is not the credible source they used to be. They burned their credibility long ago.
Written by 36234E71E4714E6502549EFFFD51E204954FFB499881C6FDFFBF63DCD89ACD1B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1931544547437449614
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1932016938592665986
- noteId - 1932016938592665986
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 36234E71E4714E6502549EFFFD51E204954FFB499881C6FDFFBF63DCD89ACD1B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1749463707956
- tweetId - 1931544547437449614
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Sadly, Snopes is not the credible source they used to be. They burned their credibility long ago.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-06-09 13:00:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-06-09 05:11:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-06-09 05:43:17 -0500 | Rating Details |