Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-05-02 18:14:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The claim that “nano-thermite” was planted in the WTC is not supported by credible scientific evidence. Studies have proved that the “evidence” is either misidentified common building materials or can be explained by the fires and destruction caused by the airplane impacts: https://www.machinedesign.com/home/article/21830429/another-blow-for-wtc-conspiracy-theorists https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2012/07/p05.pdf https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a2043/4220721/

Written by 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1918364925384155259

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1918368471575855360
  • noteId - 1918368471575855360
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1746209659844
  • tweetId - 1918364925384155259
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The claim that “nano-thermite” was planted in the WTC is not supported by credible scientific evidence. Studies have proved that the “evidence” is either misidentified common building materials or can be explained by the fires and destruction caused by the airplane impacts: https://www.machinedesign.com/home/article/21830429/another-blow-for-wtc-conspiracy-theorists https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2012/07/p05.pdf https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a2043/4220721/

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-05-02 19:32:42 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 18:28:00 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 18:24:53 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 16:57:58 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 16:51:03 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 15:15:56 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 20:11:26 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 18:55:29 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 17:35:57 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-03 22:20:53 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 16:35:46 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 16:02:09 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 15:20:49 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 14:23:40 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-03 09:22:40 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 18:13:54 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 17:39:51 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 16:13:32 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 15:18:33 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 14:21:19 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-03 20:39:53 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 17:44:26 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 16:17:47 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 16:06:30 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 15:18:15 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 20:04:41 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 18:38:07 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 16:31:44 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 15:24:42 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 14:49:29 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 18:55:04 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 17:34:40 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 15:53:54 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 19:02:11 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 18:20:18 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 17:44:54 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 14:50:57 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 16:31:52 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 22:55:17 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 19:48:12 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 14:34:18 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 19:56:03 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 16:29:19 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 14:26:19 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 18:44:08 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 15:09:23 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 14:22:07 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 18:54:29 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-02 15:56:55 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-03 20:43:34 -0400 Rating Details
2025-05-10 10:44:53 -0400 Rating Details