Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-04-08 11:49:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The claim that jet fuel alone could not melt steel is misleading because melting was not necessary for collapse. The combination of heat weakening the steel and structural damage caused by the plane impacts led to the towers' destruction: https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/national-verify/juet-fuel-cant-melt-steel-but-burned-hot-enough-damage-world-trade-center/536-d2ed9819-1d53-4b61-9f78-e25f089e5c41 https://michaelshermer.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-911-truth https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/study-faqs/wtc-towers-investigation https://sheerforceeng.com/2022/06/13/can-steel-beams-be-melted-by-jet-fuel/ https://theconversation.com/9-11-conspiracy-theories-debunked-20-years-later-engineering-experts-explain-how-the-twin-towers-collapsed-167353

Written by 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1909561920186614260

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1909574346164539728
  • noteId - 1909574346164539728
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1744112976959
  • tweetId - 1909561920186614260
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The claim that jet fuel alone could not melt steel is misleading because melting was not necessary for collapse. The combination of heat weakening the steel and structural damage caused by the plane impacts led to the towers' destruction: https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/national-verify/juet-fuel-cant-melt-steel-but-burned-hot-enough-damage-world-trade-center/536-d2ed9819-1d53-4b61-9f78-e25f089e5c41 https://michaelshermer.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-911-truth https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/study-faqs/wtc-towers-investigation https://sheerforceeng.com/2022/06/13/can-steel-beams-be-melted-by-jet-fuel/ https://theconversation.com/9-11-conspiracy-theories-debunked-20-years-later-engineering-experts-explain-how-the-twin-towers-collapsed-167353

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-04-08 10:02:02 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 18:46:39 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:23:15 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:01:13 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:21:43 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:08:11 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:59:58 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:39:32 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:34:44 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 09:26:01 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-09 00:50:38 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:18:43 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 08:35:38 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 08:10:46 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 15:31:06 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 09:10:36 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 08:56:52 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:57:32 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:38:46 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 09:32:02 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:13:31 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:14:43 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 09:47:43 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:22:43 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:29:02 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:11:02 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:09:58 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:58:36 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:36:07 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 09:56:56 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:27:14 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:22:59 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:19:05 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:16:02 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:13:36 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:18:42 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 09:55:44 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:44:49 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:25:39 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:19:49 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 12:02:28 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 11:48:51 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:02:04 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 09:59:55 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:53:20 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:50:32 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:09:25 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:33:01 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:52:35 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:23:38 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:02:33 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 09:47:32 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 10:38:08 -0400 Rating Details
2025-04-08 13:53:27 -0400 Rating Details