Birdwatch Note
2025-04-01 22:09:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
No Johns Hopkins study exists that claims, or supports the claim, that Israeli Jews lack "ancient Hebrew DNA." This claim has been disproven as based on unrelated & criticized research published in 2013 that did not involve Israeli Jewish test subjects. https://databases.library.jhu.edu/?q=Hebrew%20DNA#:~:text=No%20Databases%20Found https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/study-misrepresented-in-jewish-ancestry-claim/#:~:text=confirmed%20his%20study%20did%20not%20look%20at%20Israeli%20Jews https://www.logicallyfacts.com/en/fact-check/no-study-suggests-jews-lack-hebrew-dna https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3543766/ https://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2013/12/20/new-genetic-study-more-evidence-for-modern-ashkenazi-jews-ancient-hebrew-patrimony/ https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol/vol85/iss6/9 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.05.13.491805v1 https://bioone.org/journals/human-biology/volume-85/issue-6/027.085.0604/No-Evidence-from-Genome-Wide-Data-of-a-Khazar-Origin/10.3378/027.085.0604.short
Written by C3C055055DB21F3E422CF3A558E79C575C71850C9D7EAD017A837FE12CD081CD
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1902504718867296426
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1907193624565092546
- noteId - 1907193624565092546
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C3C055055DB21F3E422CF3A558E79C575C71850C9D7EAD017A837FE12CD081CD Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1743545368697
- tweetId - 1902504718867296426
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- No Johns Hopkins study exists that claims, or supports the claim, that Israeli Jews lack "ancient Hebrew DNA." This claim has been disproven as based on unrelated & criticized research published in 2013 that did not involve Israeli Jewish test subjects. https://databases.library.jhu.edu/?q=Hebrew%20DNA#:~:text=No%20Databases%20Found https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/study-misrepresented-in-jewish-ancestry-claim/#:~:text=confirmed%20his%20study%20did%20not%20look%20at%20Israeli%20Jews https://www.logicallyfacts.com/en/fact-check/no-study-suggests-jews-lack-hebrew-dna https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3543766/ https://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2013/12/20/new-genetic-study-more-evidence-for-modern-ashkenazi-jews-ancient-hebrew-patrimony/ https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol/vol85/iss6/9 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.05.13.491805v1 https://bioone.org/journals/human-biology/volume-85/issue-6/027.085.0604/No-Evidence-from-Genome-Wide-Data-of-a-Khazar-Origin/10.3378/027.085.0604.short
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-05-09 02:37:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-05 11:58:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-01 09:32:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-02 12:00:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-06 20:44:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-06 06:06:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-26 22:21:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-21 20:03:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-11 00:43:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-18 14:22:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-04 13:37:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-29 07:11:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-17 18:10:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-11 03:24:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-05 23:01:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-08 06:50:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-05 12:15:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-22 02:37:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-26 05:41:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-07 12:41:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-08 18:53:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-07 12:43:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-27 22:31:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-06 20:20:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-05 13:41:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-02 08:23:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-23 08:21:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-23 06:40:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-22 22:28:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-23 20:41:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-23 08:39:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-23 02:42:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-21 12:21:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-07 09:47:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-01 17:11:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-21 12:04:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-23 04:47:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-05-23 04:18:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-06-21 14:29:35 -0500 | Rating Details |