Birdwatch Note
2025-03-31 21:57:32 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Censorship of individuals for their beliefs is not a "meme". That is cancel culture. What is funny about censoring this user? And, if it's not meant to be funny, why would they censor someone who wants quality in video games, and not someone who is pro-terrorism, Hasan?
Written by BA87A070FC8356877AF5CD0477492D5052F71AF46306EEDE26B9462202F3145C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1906746833520697469
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1906828233519337832
- noteId - 1906828233519337832
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BA87A070FC8356877AF5CD0477492D5052F71AF46306EEDE26B9462202F3145C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1743458252683
- tweetId - 1906746833520697469
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Censorship of individuals for their beliefs is not a "meme". That is cancel culture. What is funny about censoring this user? And, if it's not meant to be funny, why would they censor someone who wants quality in video games, and not someone who is pro-terrorism, Hasan?
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-04-01 09:09:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 23:44:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 23:26:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 19:36:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 18:41:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 11:46:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 10:53:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 10:41:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 05:59:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 18:32:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 18:30:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 17:31:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 05:44:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 05:20:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 19:29:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 21:18:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 22:03:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 20:47:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 08:29:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 23:12:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 20:03:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 18:29:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 17:02:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 16:57:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 01:51:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 00:08:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 19:42:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 18:59:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 14:54:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 21:49:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 17:40:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 17:15:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 22:50:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 17:42:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-02 02:31:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 10:55:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 13:08:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 17:32:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 17:03:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-04-01 08:35:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 22:05:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-31 20:26:22 -0500 | Rating Details |