Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-03-20 19:22:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This image's "before" & "after" sections exhibit distinct signs of AI generation (multiple facial deformities, limb abnormalities, artifacts, clothing inconsistencies, etc.). No credible source exists authenticating the identities and circumstances of those depicted. https://www.pcmag.com/articles/how-to-detect-ai-created-images https://x.com/SiWorrick/status/1902791673198911863 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-09-13/how-to-spot-a-fake-image-ai-manipulation/103646188 https://x.com/rap_jeni/status/1902708734717039074 https://artsmart.ai/blog/is-it-ai-or-human-made/ https://brandwell.ai/ai-image-detector/?fpr=ddiy#:~:text=Highly%20likely%20to%20be%20AI%20generated

Written by C3C055055DB21F3E422CF3A558E79C575C71850C9D7EAD017A837FE12CD081CD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1902500453658849305

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1902802943369166937
  • noteId - 1902802943369166937
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C3C055055DB21F3E422CF3A558E79C575C71850C9D7EAD017A837FE12CD081CD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1742498548725
  • tweetId - 1902500453658849305
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This image's "before" & "after" sections exhibit distinct signs of AI generation (multiple facial deformities, limb abnormalities, artifacts, clothing inconsistencies, etc.). No credible source exists authenticating the identities and circumstances of those depicted. https://www.pcmag.com/articles/how-to-detect-ai-created-images https://x.com/SiWorrick/status/1902791673198911863 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-09-13/how-to-spot-a-fake-image-ai-manipulation/103646188 https://x.com/rap_jeni/status/1902708734717039074 https://artsmart.ai/blog/is-it-ai-or-human-made/ https://brandwell.ai/ai-image-detector/?fpr=ddiy#:~:text=Highly%20likely%20to%20be%20AI%20generated

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-03-20 14:54:25 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 14:38:53 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-22 05:59:51 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-21 03:22:05 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-21 01:36:38 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 14:34:46 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 20:35:41 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 14:39:13 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 14:32:22 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 14:30:48 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 16:51:37 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-21 02:52:01 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 16:41:23 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 14:43:58 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-25 07:29:34 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-21 10:17:54 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 18:32:59 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-21 00:40:55 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 14:44:52 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 14:51:23 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-21 12:39:31 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-20 14:42:35 -0500 Rating Details