Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-03-16 16:58:17 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Men are not favored by the society in terms of legal or technical arrangements wrt pregnancy, as implied by op. For example, women can get abortions in all states if it's from rape, but men need to pay child support for children born from stolen sperm https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer

Written by C3DAD457C748B151D0DA7787C5D9A3EC05F8FA1EAB5FC08046DD610B0399AFEF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1898810918408245714

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1901317107981095189
  • noteId - 1901317107981095189
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C3DAD457C748B151D0DA7787C5D9A3EC05F8FA1EAB5FC08046DD610B0399AFEF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1742144297964
  • tweetId - 1898810918408245714
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Men are not favored by the society in terms of legal or technical arrangements wrt pregnancy, as implied by op. For example, women can get abortions in all states if it's from rape, but men need to pay child support for children born from stolen sperm https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-03-16 21:56:14 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 20:40:57 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 18:32:41 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 17:10:36 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 15:22:15 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 14:43:02 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 14:00:52 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 13:51:40 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 13:49:39 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 12:46:35 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-17 09:52:05 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 17:16:37 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 16:10:10 -0500 Rating Details
2025-04-28 03:13:52 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 14:17:51 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 13:00:21 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 12:23:08 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 18:42:40 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 18:13:43 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 16:13:25 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 14:44:23 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-17 06:10:38 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-17 00:17:55 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 17:05:56 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-17 06:05:14 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 18:37:49 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 15:19:28 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 20:30:40 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 18:46:24 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 13:14:01 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-17 02:34:13 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-16 13:47:26 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-17 04:11:07 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-17 03:23:43 -0500 Rating Details