Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-03-11 06:29:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Turner vs. William is not considered good law anymore, as the standard for restrictions on speech was drastically changed by Brandenburg vs. Ohio (1969), which stated that advocacy of illegal action is protected unless it incites imminent lawless action. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/

Written by E2257CCBC345627627DC70B96A24B03E50772532DE2F0C97E5203C60F035C05D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1899221227719332040

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1899347017102450867
  • noteId - 1899347017102450867
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E2257CCBC345627627DC70B96A24B03E50772532DE2F0C97E5203C60F035C05D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1741674591695
  • tweetId - 1899221227719332040
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Turner vs. William is not considered good law anymore, as the standard for restrictions on speech was drastically changed by Brandenburg vs. Ohio (1969), which stated that advocacy of illegal action is protected unless it incites imminent lawless action. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-03-16 14:31:25 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-13 21:21:08 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-11 16:30:52 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-11 14:38:08 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-11 14:32:36 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-11 11:09:29 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-11 09:54:48 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-11 08:56:46 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-11 06:15:34 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-11 03:39:00 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-11 02:28:33 -0500 Rating Details