Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-03-10 02:48:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Neymar não entrou em campo por causa de um incômodo na coxa. Foi opção do técnico poupá-lo para evitar uma lesão mais grave. https://www.espn.com.br/futebol/santos/artigo/_/id/14894818/qual-lesao-neymar-pedro-caixinha-explica-por-que-craque-nao-atuou-corinthians-x-santos

Written by EDC9278F7492E2693570811FEA57933FD3701B7DFDE24BCF645E0A7783D40F06
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1898883761304957203

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1898929030000173430
  • noteId - 1898929030000173430
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - EDC9278F7492E2693570811FEA57933FD3701B7DFDE24BCF645E0A7783D40F06 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1741574935805
  • tweetId - 1898883761304957203
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Neymar não entrou em campo por causa de um incômodo na coxa. Foi opção do técnico poupá-lo para evitar uma lesão mais grave. https://www.espn.com.br/futebol/santos/artigo/_/id/14894818/qual-lesao-neymar-pedro-caixinha-explica-por-que-craque-nao-atuou-corinthians-x-santos

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-03-10 16:46:33 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-10 14:04:18 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-10 13:29:41 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-09 22:07:34 -0500 Rating Details
2025-03-10 04:09:41 -0500 Rating Details