Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-03-07 21:39:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The article is one year old. 18 March 2024. https://t.co/cJYIZ3Rnq3

Written by 1C5566A097377661E1E96B826FE70FA4318F935F08737B59ABE994FF7196BF38
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1898113484380049593

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1898126328664150453
  • noteId - 1898126328664150453
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1C5566A097377661E1E96B826FE70FA4318F935F08737B59ABE994FF7196BF38 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1741383556893
  • tweetId - 1898113484380049593
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The article is one year old. 18 March 2024. https://t.co/cJYIZ3Rnq3

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-03-07 16:05:05 -0600 Rating Details
2025-03-07 16:02:01 -0600 Rating Details
2025-03-07 15:55:25 -0600 Rating Details
2025-03-07 15:55:46 -0600 Rating Details
2025-03-07 15:46:00 -0600 Rating Details
2025-03-07 16:16:22 -0600 Rating Details
2025-03-07 16:01:55 -0600 Rating Details
2025-03-07 16:16:18 -0600 Rating Details
2025-03-07 15:57:05 -0600 Rating Details