Birdwatch Note
2025-03-07 21:39:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The article is one year old. 18 March 2024. https://t.co/cJYIZ3Rnq3
Written by 1C5566A097377661E1E96B826FE70FA4318F935F08737B59ABE994FF7196BF38
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1898113484380049593
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1898126328664150453
- noteId - 1898126328664150453
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1C5566A097377661E1E96B826FE70FA4318F935F08737B59ABE994FF7196BF38 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1741383556893
- tweetId - 1898113484380049593
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The article is one year old. 18 March 2024. https://t.co/cJYIZ3Rnq3
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-03-07 16:05:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-07 16:02:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-07 15:55:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-07 15:55:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-07 15:46:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-07 16:16:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-07 16:01:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-07 16:16:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-03-07 15:57:05 -0600 | Rating Details |