Birdwatch Note
2025-02-25 16:05:46 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
動画の10秒あたりの妊娠中のコロナワクチン接種で80%が流産との噂ですが、妊娠中のコロナワクチン接種は、非常に多数の客観的な記録を使った研究がされており、それらの多数を統合する、メタアナリシスにより、接種者のリスク上昇は検出されていません(日本語解説記事)。 https://medical.nikkeibp.co.jp/leaf/mem/pub/hotnews/popular/202305/579601.html なお、80%が流産等の噂に関しては下記の２種類の誤情報が少なくとも存在し、ともに稚拙な誤情報である事が下記記事等で検証されています。 ナオミウルフ氏のファイザーワクチン販売後データに関する誤解の検証記事 https://www.berkshireeagle.com/ap/factcheck/posts-distort-data-on-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-and-pregnancy/article_90231eca-e9ae-11ec-969b-b35c13e0a9f5.html NEJM論文のデータが流産率82%を示しているという販売後初期のネットデマの検証記事 https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N2OX1WL/
Written by F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1894220687713444298
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1894418520857088256
- noteId - 1894418520857088256
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1740499546624
- tweetId - 1894220687713444298
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 動画の10秒あたりの妊娠中のコロナワクチン接種で80%が流産との噂ですが、妊娠中のコロナワクチン接種は、非常に多数の客観的な記録を使った研究がされており、それらの多数を統合する、メタアナリシスにより、接種者のリスク上昇は検出されていません(日本語解説記事)。 https://medical.nikkeibp.co.jp/leaf/mem/pub/hotnews/popular/202305/579601.html なお、80%が流産等の噂に関しては下記の２種類の誤情報が少なくとも存在し、ともに稚拙な誤情報である事が下記記事等で検証されています。 ナオミウルフ氏のファイザーワクチン販売後データに関する誤解の検証記事 https://www.berkshireeagle.com/ap/factcheck/posts-distort-data-on-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-and-pregnancy/article_90231eca-e9ae-11ec-969b-b35c13e0a9f5.html NEJM論文のデータが流産率82%を示しているという販売後初期のネットデマの検証記事 https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N2OX1WL/
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-26 08:46:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-26 06:32:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-26 01:51:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 22:18:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 22:09:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 19:34:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 19:18:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 19:06:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 18:34:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 18:01:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:57:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:57:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:10:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:04:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:00:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 16:32:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 16:30:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 16:06:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 16:02:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 15:54:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 15:42:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 14:11:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 13:26:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 13:24:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 13:00:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 12:45:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 12:06:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 11:16:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-27 16:46:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 18:44:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 18:34:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:55:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:51:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:06:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 16:42:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 16:31:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 16:10:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 15:09:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 14:41:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 12:14:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 10:09:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-27 07:25:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-27 02:01:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-26 08:47:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-26 08:11:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 20:35:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 19:56:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:56:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:45:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 17:30:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 16:31:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 16:30:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 14:52:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 14:32:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 14:21:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 13:56:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 12:48:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 12:31:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 12:31:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 12:07:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 11:38:37 -0600 | Rating Details |