Birdwatch Note
2025-02-25 00:32:56 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Being forced to re-hired workers that were fired without any impact assessment is not efficient. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g3nrx1dq5o https://apnews.com/article/fda-layoffs-trump-doge-rehired-medical-devices-85d4743e4ce88dbe3b99c813bad4b702
Written by 4403909C8775FD16FDED40055ADF40DD518A2C7DE84A5FC251D72AFC38185B56
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1894121185694060861
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1894183765972586825
- noteId - 1894183765972586825
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4403909C8775FD16FDED40055ADF40DD518A2C7DE84A5FC251D72AFC38185B56 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1740443576697
- tweetId - 1894121185694060861
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Being forced to re-hired workers that were fired without any impact assessment is not efficient. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g3nrx1dq5o https://apnews.com/article/fda-layoffs-trump-doge-rehired-medical-devices-85d4743e4ce88dbe3b99c813bad4b702
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-24 19:34:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:07:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:05:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:54:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:52:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:42:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:38:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:46:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:44:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:51:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:48:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:41:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:38:11 -0600 | Rating Details |