Birdwatch Note
2025-02-24 23:13:15 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Lady Gaga is not a zionist. There’s no public evidence of her supporting Zionism as a political ideology. She has not commented about the Israel-Palestine conflict. https://www.newsweek.com/lady-gaga-backlash-super-bowl-photo-israel-hamas-palestinians-instagram-photo-1869516
Written by D0EC1D6195957FE98876199C8D2666B574128E0E6EA33EDE43B9A524DF47E47D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1893910249070833843
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1894163712514429410
- noteId - 1894163712514429410
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D0EC1D6195957FE98876199C8D2666B574128E0E6EA33EDE43B9A524DF47E47D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1740438795581
- tweetId - 1893910249070833843
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Lady Gaga is not a zionist. There’s no public evidence of her supporting Zionism as a political ideology. She has not commented about the Israel-Palestine conflict. https://www.newsweek.com/lady-gaga-backlash-super-bowl-photo-israel-hamas-palestinians-instagram-photo-1869516
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-24 21:11:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 20:33:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 20:05:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 20:04:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:56:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:31:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:30:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:28:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:27:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:17:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:02:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:39:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:29:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:23:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:05:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 17:57:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 17:56:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 17:37:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 17:20:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 23:41:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:38:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:31:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 17:46:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 22:45:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:59:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:34:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:18:03 -0600 | Rating Details |