Birdwatch Note
2025-02-24 23:10:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
note needed - NNN writers don't understand polling methodology. A huge sample size doesn't matter if the result is inherently overly representative of certain demographics or ideologies. Would you trust a poll posted by AOC on Bluesky would be reflective of the population? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_poll
Written by E79BE314452698056820D1F4B4A217A0FE599467EE9E22ADCE22C177D8C5570D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1894052984377483426
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1894162906616664244
- noteId - 1894162906616664244
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E79BE314452698056820D1F4B4A217A0FE599467EE9E22ADCE22C177D8C5570D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1740438603439
- tweetId - 1894052984377483426
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- note needed - NNN writers don't understand polling methodology. A huge sample size doesn't matter if the result is inherently overly representative of certain demographics or ideologies. Would you trust a poll posted by AOC on Bluesky would be reflective of the population? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_poll
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-25 05:02:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 05:01:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 04:47:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 03:24:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 23:15:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 20:51:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 20:35:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 19:39:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 18:16:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 17:33:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 17:20:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-26 09:55:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 14:21:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 14:20:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 13:18:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 11:06:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 09:39:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 09:37:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 09:26:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 08:23:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-25 00:08:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 22:50:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 21:54:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-24 21:00:08 -0600 | Rating Details |