Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-02-23 14:26:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Current evidence supports the 0.7 mg/L recommendation as a balance between preventing cavities and minimizing risks, with no credible proof of systemic harm at this level: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/medical-critical-thinking-history/fluoride-controversy https://www.factcheck.org/2024/02/cdc-experts-say-fluoridated-water-is-safe-contrary-to-rfk-jr-s-warnings/ https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-11-fluoride-cancer-iq-loss.html https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/chemicals/water-fluoridation-and-cancer-risk.html https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9866357/ https://www.nelsonavedental.com/single-post/does-fluoride-calcify-the-pineal-gland Myths and facts: https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Programs/OH/Fluoridation_and_Fluorides/Myths-Facts.pdf Fluoride Exposure: Neurodevelopment and Cognition: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/assessments/noncancer/completed/fluoride

Written by 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1893545080322945296

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1893668869656449343
  • noteId - 1893668869656449343
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1740320815849
  • tweetId - 1893545080322945296
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Current evidence supports the 0.7 mg/L recommendation as a balance between preventing cavities and minimizing risks, with no credible proof of systemic harm at this level: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/medical-critical-thinking-history/fluoride-controversy https://www.factcheck.org/2024/02/cdc-experts-say-fluoridated-water-is-safe-contrary-to-rfk-jr-s-warnings/ https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-11-fluoride-cancer-iq-loss.html https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/chemicals/water-fluoridation-and-cancer-risk.html https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9866357/ https://www.nelsonavedental.com/single-post/does-fluoride-calcify-the-pineal-gland Myths and facts: https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Programs/OH/Fluoridation_and_Fluorides/Myths-Facts.pdf Fluoride Exposure: Neurodevelopment and Cognition: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/assessments/noncancer/completed/fluoride

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-02-23 12:57:30 -0500 Rating Details
2025-02-23 11:45:22 -0500 Rating Details
2025-02-23 11:44:56 -0500 Rating Details
2025-02-23 10:20:40 -0500 Rating Details
2025-02-23 10:06:13 -0500 Rating Details
2025-02-23 14:54:09 -0500 Rating Details
2025-02-23 12:30:45 -0500 Rating Details
2025-02-23 11:19:38 -0500 Rating Details