Birdwatch Note
2025-02-23 03:09:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The study in question included fraudulent data and is likely to be retracted. https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1893492682019750212
Written by 551C61F5C669CCB7D2DFC11E83C271029550514C8CD5C240A4C9E2B6809469FD
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1893451651903549466
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1893498510382899462
- noteId - 1893498510382899462
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 551C61F5C669CCB7D2DFC11E83C271029550514C8CD5C240A4C9E2B6809469FD Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1740280199033
- tweetId - 1893451651903549466
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The study in question included fraudulent data and is likely to be retracted. https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1893492682019750212
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-02-23 10:12:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-23 08:24:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-22 22:44:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-22 22:35:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-22 22:30:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-22 22:19:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-22 21:27:00 -0600 | Rating Details |