Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-02-22 22:32:23 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Luckily, they did not lose her embryos. Per the article: “The statement from Coastal Fertility said that ‘all of Ms. Murray’s embryos have been accounted for and are available to her at any time.’” https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/19/us/georgia-embryo-ivf-mistake.html?smid=url-share

Written by 1644F125C0B7B5A69C50C9895B6A98C112EC26B51E5CB7A0EE28B4D4C2FD1070
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1893041457017000209

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1893428652940894466
  • noteId - 1893428652940894466
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1644F125C0B7B5A69C50C9895B6A98C112EC26B51E5CB7A0EE28B4D4C2FD1070 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1740263543721
  • tweetId - 1893041457017000209
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Luckily, they did not lose her embryos. Per the article: “The statement from Coastal Fertility said that ‘all of Ms. Murray’s embryos have been accounted for and are available to her at any time.’” https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/19/us/georgia-embryo-ivf-mistake.html?smid=url-share

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-02-22 17:47:21 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 16:56:27 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-23 12:49:33 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-23 12:19:24 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-23 03:08:29 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-23 00:47:34 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 22:50:18 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 21:17:14 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 19:07:04 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 18:14:30 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 18:01:53 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-23 03:11:44 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 19:02:13 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-23 11:08:10 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-23 01:54:50 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-23 01:28:52 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 21:43:08 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 20:33:26 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 20:14:49 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 17:54:10 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-22 16:50:58 -0600 Rating Details