Birdwatch Note
2025-02-20 17:36:57 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN can we start banning contributors who don't actually provide sources that's half the point of CN.
Written by B35DC064761040264876318C968FA8F6167D057B61D7AB5F84F46ABBF4FF9813
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1892255777546526754
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1892629529635758507
- noteId - 1892629529635758507
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B35DC064761040264876318C968FA8F6167D057B61D7AB5F84F46ABBF4FF9813 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1740073017878
- tweetId - 1892255777546526754
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN can we start banning contributors who don't actually provide sources that's half the point of CN.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-20 12:32:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 12:30:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 11:44:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 11:37:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 11:37:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 11:38:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 13:56:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 12:20:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 11:38:46 -0600 | Rating Details |