Birdwatch Note
2025-02-20 05:56:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
記事では、腎臓の有害事象に関するコロナワクチンの他のワクチンと比べた「報告率の違い」が記載されています。 https://promea2014.com/blog/?p=29719 接種後有害事象の任意の報告頻度は報道や https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X13004874 販売後の時間等 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/8/1/117 多様な影響を受けCDCは実際の頻度の評価には使えないと明示しています https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html#:~:text=VAERS%20is%20the%20nation's%20early,make%20sure%20vaccines%20are%20safe. 例えば同じコロナワクチンも全有害事象・副反応の報告率は２１年の最初の４ロットと２２年の最初の４ロットを比べると１００分の１になっています(88P https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10601000/001161404.pdf#page=88 コロナワクチンと腎障害の関連は客観的医療記録を使った多数の研究がされ、いずれも対照条件と比べリスク増加が検出されていません。 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110475 https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004018 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40264-023-01332-1 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0085253822006974
Written by F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1892341838373093754
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1892453261690753317
- noteId - 1892453261690753317
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1740030992325
- tweetId - 1892341838373093754
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 記事では、腎臓の有害事象に関するコロナワクチンの他のワクチンと比べた「報告率の違い」が記載されています。 https://promea2014.com/blog/?p=29719 接種後有害事象の任意の報告頻度は報道や https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X13004874 販売後の時間等 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/8/1/117 多様な影響を受けCDCは実際の頻度の評価には使えないと明示しています https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html#:~:text=VAERS%20is%20the%20nation's%20early,make%20sure%20vaccines%20are%20safe. 例えば同じコロナワクチンも全有害事象・副反応の報告率は２１年の最初の４ロットと２２年の最初の４ロットを比べると１００分の１になっています(88P https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10601000/001161404.pdf#page=88 コロナワクチンと腎障害の関連は客観的医療記録を使った多数の研究がされ、いずれも対照条件と比べリスク増加が検出されていません。 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110475 https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004018 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40264-023-01332-1 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0085253822006974
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-20 17:13:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 06:22:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 05:53:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 01:58:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 01:26:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 01:24:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 01:20:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 00:44:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 00:36:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 00:24:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 00:04:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 19:33:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 07:17:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 02:47:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 02:23:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 01:44:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 00:49:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-22 12:33:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 19:09:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 04:22:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-21 11:39:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-22 20:28:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 19:09:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 06:32:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-20 02:44:44 -0600 | Rating Details |