Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-02-18 03:14:48 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

O autor da nota literalmente confirmou o post, logo a nota é desnecessária.

Written by 8F6349B5F32700004C911C895BDEFCE6325A71CD8EB0B3661C69EF843537B23E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1891516068545413307

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1891687783728656461
  • noteId - 1891687783728656461
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8F6349B5F32700004C911C895BDEFCE6325A71CD8EB0B3661C69EF843537B23E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1739848488158
  • tweetId - 1891516068545413307
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • O autor da nota literalmente confirmou o post, logo a nota é desnecessária.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-02-18 12:48:30 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-18 01:41:12 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-17 22:07:39 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-18 04:57:47 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-17 23:18:27 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-18 01:40:12 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-17 21:40:46 -0600 Rating Details