Birdwatch Note
2025-02-15 13:04:55 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
La note proposée est complètement hors de propos. A aucun moment l'auteur du post ne considère que les enquêtes sont "totalement faux" (sic). Il ne s'exprime pas sur le fond du dossier, et pointe uniquement un double-discours (supposé ou réel).
Written by 06E2844EF70A3047BB67336D87ADCCC03F2B0CDC11C54CD0A6052754898B61ED
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1890030336706502953
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1890749130063933750
- noteId - 1890749130063933750
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 06E2844EF70A3047BB67336D87ADCCC03F2B0CDC11C54CD0A6052754898B61ED Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1739624695684
- tweetId - 1890030336706502953
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- La note proposée est complètement hors de propos. A aucun moment l'auteur du post ne considère que les enquêtes sont "totalement faux" (sic). Il ne s'exprime pas sur le fond du dossier, et pointe uniquement un double-discours (supposé ou réel).
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-02-15 08:12:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-15 11:03:21 -0600 | Rating Details |