Birdwatch Note
2025-02-13 08:27:11 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN Voici l’étude en question, qui a bien été publiée dans une revue à comité de lecture. Si des informations y sont erronées ou mal interprétées il convient de les critiquer. https://x.com/avibittmd/status/1889667728023162893?s=46
Written by 0B7EBF7366AE93CB4BD2F38303DA78EEA884FE5352746BC802933F8C7585E9A1
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1889702279621841125
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1889954459188375770
- noteId - 1889954459188375770
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0B7EBF7366AE93CB4BD2F38303DA78EEA884FE5352746BC802933F8C7585E9A1 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1739435231384
- tweetId - 1889702279621841125
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN Voici l’étude en question, qui a bien été publiée dans une revue à comité de lecture. Si des informations y sont erronées ou mal interprétées il convient de les critiquer. https://x.com/avibittmd/status/1889667728023162893?s=46
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-13 08:28:56 -0600 | Rating Details |