Birdwatch Note
2025-02-12 03:37:41 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. It edited literally two words. From "several affairs" to "raping", which legally, it would be. The current proposed note would likely be more misleading than the post itself https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nugent#Relationships_with_teenage_girls
Written by E57CFE910CC4F3852B90A7E429913969EC41639D2A60CF5F0D6669F562BE0A7C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1889345766436569557
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1889519218082849106
- noteId - 1889519218082849106
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E57CFE910CC4F3852B90A7E429913969EC41639D2A60CF5F0D6669F562BE0A7C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1739331461817
- tweetId - 1889345766436569557
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. It edited literally two words. From "several affairs" to "raping", which legally, it would be. The current proposed note would likely be more misleading than the post itself https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nugent#Relationships_with_teenage_girls
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-11 22:24:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 22:40:43 -0600 | Rating Details |